http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2010/03/archaeology-team-discovers-parts-of-solomons-temple-11086?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=archaeology-team-discovers-parts-of-solomons-temple Not your average Christian mag Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:41:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2010/03/archaeology-team-discovers-parts-of-solomons-temple-11086/comment-page-1#comment-1972 Tiffany Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:08:44 +0000 http://theundergroundsite.com/?p=11086#comment-1972 @Beau I totally agree with you. I'm glad you understand that a person's worldview affects how he or she sees things---whether he is an archaeologist, scientist or journalist.Thanks for the support! @Beau I totally agree with you. I’m glad you understand that a person’s worldview affects how he or she sees things—whether he is an archaeologist, scientist or journalist.Thanks for the support!

]]> http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2010/03/archaeology-team-discovers-parts-of-solomons-temple-11086/comment-page-1#comment-1960 Beau Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:16:27 +0000 http://theundergroundsite.com/?p=11086#comment-1960 Great article. Wonderful to read archaeology continues to confirm Biblical account. As of yet, I haven't read where it didn't. Oh I have read claims of such. However, evidences don't speak for themselves. They need interpreters. And some wear Biblical lens while others hold a secular worldview. The said fact is those seeking to "disprove" Biblical account fail to see their own pretenses. Great article. Wonderful to read archaeology continues to confirm Biblical account. As of yet, I haven’t read where it didn’t. Oh I have read claims of such. However, evidences don’t speak for themselves. They need interpreters. And some wear Biblical lens while others hold a secular worldview. The said fact is those seeking to “disprove” Biblical account fail to see their own pretenses.

]]> http://theundergroundsite.com/index.php/2010/03/archaeology-team-discovers-parts-of-solomons-temple-11086/comment-page-1#comment-1947 On the Mystery of Lost Books | USAHM News | The Media Hitman Has Arrived. Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:23:25 +0000 http://theundergroundsite.com/?p=11086#comment-1947 [...] The Book of the Acts of Solomon most probably did exist since it is referenced to, not alluded, as a valid source. It most likely contained documents and events that transpired around the era of the kingship of Solomon; wars, diplomacy, etc. I personally don’t think it’s a stretch to assume there is detailed information on the infamous Queen of Sheba (Solomon’s wife) herself. It’s fair to say that the Book of the Acts of Solomon included a lot more information than the writer of Kings was prepared to say. Besides depicting a militaristic and political history one can only assume further that it did indeed speak of the infamous Temple of Solomon where the Ark of the Covenant was at one stage believed to have been housed. How different would recorded history be if we had this book in our possession to this day? Surely at least they would have found his temple a lot earlier than 2010. [...] [...] The Book of the Acts of Solomon most probably did exist since it is referenced to, not alluded, as a valid source. It most likely contained documents and events that transpired around the era of the kingship of Solomon; wars, diplomacy, etc. I personally don’t think it’s a stretch to assume there is detailed information on the infamous Queen of Sheba (Solomon’s wife) herself. It’s fair to say that the Book of the Acts of Solomon included a lot more information than the writer of Kings was prepared to say. Besides depicting a militaristic and political history one can only assume further that it did indeed speak of the infamous Temple of Solomon where the Ark of the Covenant was at one stage believed to have been housed. How different would recorded history be if we had this book in our possession to this day? Surely at least they would have found his temple a lot earlier than 2010. [...]

]]>